ESTATE TAX PLANNING IN MALAYSIA
Blenheim Palace was the home of Winston Churchill’s family for many generations, but like so many other English stately homes which are now open to the public, it owes its present status to the ravages of estate duty
Posted Date: Oct 15, 2010
By: Richard Thornton

ESTATE TAX PLANNING IN MALAYSIA

Blenheim Palace was the home of Winston Churchill’s family for many generations, but like so many other English stately homes which are now open to the public, it owes its present status to the ravages of estate duty. Taxed at rates of up to 80% on the value of assets passing on death, inheritors often had no choice but to allow public access to their family estates.  Necessity is the mother of invention, and other ways were also found to deal with the problem such as avoiding tax by making well-timed lifetime gifts or settling property in trust so as to skip several generations. Predictably, this led to increasing complications in the law as governments tried to close perceived loopholes.(許多西方國家對於房地產遺產皆有徵收高額稅金的問題)

Malaysians never had much need for tax planning to mitigate taxes payable on death or lifetime transfers of wealth. Since estate duty was abolished in 1991, no death duty or inheritance tax has been levied and Malaysians have been left free to transfer their wealth untrammelled by any kind of tax or levy. Undoubtedly this has contributed to the spectacular growth of the Malaysian economy over the last two or three decades. (馬來西亞自1991年廢除遺產稅,如果與台灣進行比較,台灣目前是10%遺產稅)

Nevertheless, affluent Malaysians have found it expedient to use estate planning techniques to cope with some non-tax problems. They are often brought into play to handle the complexities of inheritance within an extended family where there are children with different parents. Setting up lifetime arrangements for succession may help to prevent disputes about the disposition of a person’s estate on his death.

Sometimes, the founder of a successful business wants to ensure that it will continue to be controlled by person(s) he considers to be competent. Although death and inheritance taxes can now be ignored, there are some other tax issues that Malaysians should beware of in passing on their wealth.(雖然馬來西亞沒有遺產稅,但是依然必須注意下面的其他稅制,可能會影響到你的財產移轉)

MAKING GIFTS OF PROPERTY

Changing the ownership of a property is neither simple nor cheap. Aside from the legal costs of dealing with the transfer, you will need to reckon with stamp duty and possibly real property gains tax (RPGT). Careful planning will ensure that a property is registered in the right ownership at the time of acquisition so that expensive title transfers do not have to be made later.(如果你要改變房地產持有人身份,必須注意到移轉房地產時的律師費用,印花稅與資本利得稅)

Stamp duty can be costly at 1% on the first RM100,000 of value, 2% on the next RM400,000 and 3% on the remainder(印花稅最高是3%). Generally, it applies based on the market value of a property when a gift is made(印花稅是根據你目前的市場行情房價決定的), but the good news is that a remission is available for certain family dispositions. Transfers between husband and wife qualify for complete remission of the duty payable and transfers from father and/or mother to a child attract a 50% remission.(先生轉移給太太免印花稅,但是父母轉移給小孩是1.5%印花稅)

RPGT may also apply on the disposal of a property by way of gift within five years of the date of acquisition. The market value is deemed to be the disposal price but, as the effective tax rate is currently only 5%, it need not be a costly impost. (資本利得稅是5%)

Furthermore, no tax will be payable at all where the donor and the recipient are husband and wife, parent and child or grandparent and grandchild. (另外,夫妻,父母與子女,祖父母與祖孫之間的贈與是免稅的,但是資本利得稅依然存在)What happens then is that the asset is deemed to have been disposed of on a no gain/no loss basis. This is fine for the donor but it might not always be good for the recipient, the reason being that the recipient is deemed to have acquired the asset on the date of the gift at the same acquisition price together with permitted expenses as incurred by the donor. This can present a trap for the unwary as illustrated by the following example:

Alex Chea bought a bungalow from a developer on 30 June 2005 at a price of RM800,000. His permitted (incidental) expenses amounted to RM50,000. He made a gift of the bungalow to his son Peter on 5 May 2010 when the market value was RM2,000,000. Peter promptly put the bungalow on the market and sold it on 15 August 2010 for RM1,800,000 net of selling costs.

Although Alex owned the bungalow for less than five years, his disposal by way of a gift to his son is treated as a no gain/no loss transaction so the current market value is not relevant and no tax is payable. Peter’s period of ownership is also less than five years but he is liable to RPGT. Even though he made a loss by comparison with the market value at the date of the gift, he has a chargeable gain of RM950,000 (RM1,800,000 – RM800,000 – RM50,000). After allowing for a 10% exemption, the tax at 5% is RM42,750. There is no provision for the donee’s acquisition date to be related back to the acquisition date of the donor.

A more tax-efficient arrangement would have been for Alex to sell the bungalow after 30 June 2010 and then make a cash gift to Peter but such an alternative is not always possible.      

THE BEST PROPERTY-OWNING VEHICLE – A COMPANY OR A TRUST?

Traditionally, companies have been used for fragmenting the ownership of property assets in Malaysia but some of the tax advantages of using a company no longer apply. A company tagged as an investment holding company may suffer a severe restriction on deductibility of directors’ fees. Furthermore, with the switch to the single-tier dividend system, there is no advantage in paying dividends to different shareholders as the dividend tax credit is no longer available. For some investors, it might make some sense to use a family trust rather than a family company.

A trust is liable to tax on its income in much the same way as a company but a trust is still allowed to pass on the benefit of the tax paid by the trustees as tax credits. This means that income can be spread around and placed in the hands of beneficiaries enjoying relatively low tax rates who can benefit from the tax credits, as illustrated by the following example:

James Happy has negotiated to purchase a commercial complex at his own expense and he intends to put it into shared ownership (25% each) by himself, his wife Mary, their son Justin and James’s widowed mother Alice. The complex will produce a net annual income of RM300,000. They have considered using either a company or a discretionary trust as the investment vehicle. In each case, the expected annual tax liability will be about RM75,000 (assuming tax at 25%).

Neither Mary, Justin nor Alice have any other income. Best tax planning seems to point to the use of a trust as each beneficiary would expect to have the benefit of a tax credit of RM18,750 per annum whereas the company situation means that there would be no tax credits for shareholders. With a taxable income of RM75,000, each of them except James could expect to have an annual tax repayment of about RM12,000.

This is a much simplified example and other tax and commercial implications would need to be taken into account before any decision is made.

FAMILY SETTLEMENTS AND TAX PITFALLS 

Although little use has been made of trusts for tax planning in Malaysia, anti-avoidance provisions designed to combat aggressive tax planning still exist. The objective of the provisions is achieved by deeming the income concerned to be income of the settlor and not of any other person.

One situation in which such deeming applies is where, by virtue of a settlement, income for a year of assessment is payable or applicable for the benefit of any relative of the settlor who at the beginning of that year is under the age of 21 and unmarried. The obvious intention is to prevent wealthy individuals from passing over their assets or income to family members who have nil or low tax rates.

A relative includes a child of the settlor and this could have implications for the Happy family in the above example. James is the settlor and Justin is his child. Provided that Justin has attained the age of 21, there is no problem. However, for any year in which Justin is under 21 at the beginning of that year, Justin’s share of the trust income is deemed to be James’s income and there will be no entitlement to a tax repayment.

Readers who wish to know more may refer to the two books mentioned below as well as to 100 Ways to Save Tax in Malaysia for Individuals (ISBN978-967-5040-43-6) by the same author

Richard Thornton is author of 100 Ways to Save Tax in Malaysia for Property Investors (ISBN978-983-2631-83-5) and 100 Ways to Save Tax for Malaysian Investors (ISBN978-967-5040-42-9) published by Sweet & Maxwell Asia. See http://malaysiaauthorindex.com/wiki/Richard Thornton. He is also a Fellow of the Chartered Tax Institute of Malaysia.

The two works referred to immediately above contain some valuable insights on how to achieve legitimate tax savings for investors in property and other assets as well as dealing with complex issues such as “When can an investor be taxed as a dealer?” and “Is it a good idea to use a company?” Written in clear simple language, the books contain helpful examples to explain how the tax planning ideas can be put into action. They can be obtained from most book stores, or from the author at ricton100@gmail.com

asiarealestate 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Wills and Inheritance in Malaysia

Information pertaining to writing a will in Malaysia, and the laws relating to inheritance and distribution in Malaysia…

The purpose of writing a will is for a person to leave behind a legacy for loved ones, and to ensure that they are well provided for in the unfortunate event of the testator’s passing. If a person dies intestate (without having written a valid will), then the provisions under the Distribution Act 1958 will apply unless he or she is a Muslim in West Malaysia and Sarawak or is a native of Sarawak. If the person is in the state of Sabah, then the Intestate Succession Ordinance 1960 will apply. Both the act and ordinance set out the manner of distribution of any property to specific beneficiaries, after all outstanding debts (including taxes) are paid. In addition, the provisions under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971 allow the courts to grant an order that the maintenance of certain categories of dependents shall be reasonably provided for where such dependents have not been provided for, or are inadequately provided for, under the testator’s will.

Foreigners and Wills(馬來西亞外國人與遺囑)

Malaysia recognises the validity of international wills that relate to properties and assets owned by the testator in other parts of the world.  However, it is highly recommended that a foreigner make a will in Malaysia under the following circumstances:(馬來西亞承認國外遺囑,但是最好在馬來西亞本地立有遺囑)

  • They are living permanently in Malaysia and would be considered a ‘permanent resident’ of Malaysia at the time of their passing
  • They own immovable properties in Malaysia (land and buildings, for instance)(當你有房地產在馬來西亞,最好在馬來西亞有遺囑,當然國外的遺囑也可以)

Failure to make a will in Malaysia may mean that delays occur in the transfer of their properties and assets in Malaysia to their beneficiaries, wherever they may be. In short, having a will made in their country of origin that covers all assets is still valid, but there may still be delays when it is applied in Malaysia, especially when it involves immovable properties bound by administrative red tape. As such, it would be advisable to make a will in Malaysia addressing Malaysian properties and assets to avoid the risk of delays that may take years to settle.(如果遺囑是國外的遺囑,雖然可受益,但是會拖慢受益人受益的時間)

Qualifying to Make a Will

There are three prerequisites that must be satisfied when making a will before it is considered valid:

  • The testator must be at least eighteen years old as stipulated under the Age of Majority Act 1971 in West Malaysia and Sarawak, whereas in Sabah, the age of majority is twenty-one years old as stated under Section 4 of the Wills Ordinance 1953(立遺囑人必須年滿18歲)
  • The testator must be of ‘sound mind’ (“testamentary capacity”) as provided by Section 3 of the Wills Act 1959(立遺矚者必須頭腦清楚)
  • The will must be in writing, and must also be signed by the testator (or affixed with the testator’s mark) at the foot or end of the will in the presence of two witnesses. The will must be attested by two or more witnesses in the presence of the testator and each other(立遺囑時必須有兩位見證者,必須被書寫成文字)
Intestacy – Letter of Administration

When a person dies intestate (without leaving a valid will), there may be a delay in distribution due to the following:

  • Choosing an administrator: the beneficiaries may not agree on the person intending to apply for the Letter of Administration. The Probate and Administration Act 1959 requires all lawful beneficiaries to waive in writing their right to be administrator when appointing an administrator
  • Valuing the estate: a lot of time and manpower is required to locate, collect, assess and value all assets and liabilities. As a result, there will be increasing costs to the estate and its beneficiaries as the need for legal services, accountants, tax consultants and other professionals arises.
  • Finding two sureties: the administrator must find two sureties to sign an administration bond, and the sureties must have assets within the jurisdiction equivalent to the value of the deceased’s estate.  However, no surety is required if:
    1. the estate does not exceed RM50,000
    2. a trust corporation is being appointed as the administrator
    3. the administrator is the sole beneficiary, in which case sureties are waivered at the discretion of the court (as per Section 35 of the Probate and Administration Act 1959)
  • Lawful beneficiaries: When an individual dies intestate, their estate is distributed according to the Distribution Act 1958. Due to the delays caused by the factors mentioned above, sometimes the estate will have to be distributed to many beneficiaries who inherit from the original beneficiaries (who may have passed away over time), or who may have relocated to different countries. Even if there are no difficulties with having many beneficiaries or with finding them, the application of the intestacy law in Malaysia will create other difficulties as shown below, be it the Distribution Act 1958 or the Intestate Succession Ordinance 1960. In addition, the intestate will not be able to dictate the terms of the distribution of their estate to the people chosen to be beneficiaries, determine what assets are to be inherited by whom, or choose the manner of their distribution. Section 6 of the Distribution Act 1958 Provides the following:
Intestate dies leaving surviving:Distribution of Estate:
Spouse only (no parent(s) or issue) Spouse: whole estate
Spouse and parent(s) (no issue) Spouse: 1/2; parent(s): 1/2
Issue only (no spouse or parent(s)) Issue: whole estate
Parents(s) only (no spouse or issue) Parent(s): whole estate
Spouse and issue (no parent(s)) Spouse: 1/3; issue: 2/3
Parent(s) and issue (no spouse) Parent(s):  1/3; issue: 2/3
Spouse, parent(s) and issue Spouse: 1/4; parent(s): 1/4; issue: 2/4
No spouse, issue or parents The following person(s), related to the intestate and alive at the death of intestate, in the following order:
  1. Brother(s) and sister(s)
  2. Grandparent(s)
  3. Uncle(s) and aunt(s)
  4. Great grandparent(s)
  5. Great grand uncle(s) and aunt(s)
In default of any person taking absolute interest under the foregoing provisions S.6(1)(a)-(i) Whole estate, except land, to the government (land remains frozen)
Employee Pension Fund (EPF)

It is highly recommended that all employees who contribute to the Employee Pension Fund (EPF) nominate their beneficiaries on the EPF nomination form. Failing this, the EPF assets will be distributed in accordance with their will. If the person dies intestate, then it will be distributed in accordance with the acts earlier stated.

Cancellation, Alteration and Revocation

A will is automatically revoked when one or more of the following circumstances occur:

  • Marriage: marriage will revoke a will made earlier by the testator unless it was expressed in the will that it was made in contemplation of marriage, and shall not be revoked by the solemnisation of the marriage contemplated to the named fiancé(e) (Section 12, Wills Act 1959)
  • Writing a new will: only the latest will would be recognised as the valid one by the courts (Section 14, Wills Act 1959)
  • Declaration in writing of an intention to revoke the will: the testator makes a written statement about their intention to revoke the will. The said statement has to be signed by the testator in the presence of two witnesses
  • Conversion to the Islamic faith: Section 2(2) of the Wills Act 1959 states that the Act does not apply to wills of persons professing the religion of Islam. When the testator (previously a non-Muslim) embraces the Islamic faith, the will made previously shall be void as it no longer comes under the ambit of the Wills Act 1959. The testator, after conversion, can write a new will in accordance with the Islamic Laws whereby only one third of the total estate can be disposed of by way of a will, and the remaining two thirds by Sijil Faraid (a certificate of Muslim inheritance law). If the Muslim testator would like to dispose of more than one third of their total estate, the consent of all lawful beneficiaries must be obtained
  • Intentional destruction: a will can be burnt, torn or otherwise intentionally destroyed by the testator or a third party in the presence of the testator and under their direction, with the intention to revoke the will (s. 14). Accidental or malicious destruction by a third party does not render the revocation effective
Information provided by Michael J.C. Folk
Probiz Business Services
4 Lorong 14/37E, 46100 Petaling Jaya, Selangor D.E.
Tel:01 2236 7881 e-mail

asiarealestate 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

1.1 Estate tax(美國徵收遺產稅)

The United States (US) imposes an estate tax on the transfer of a decedent’s taxable estate, also known as the gross estate, at death. US citizens and residents dying after 31 December 2012 are subject to a top estate tax rate of 40% and are entitled to a $5 million estate tax exemption,which is adjusted annually for inflation ($5.25 million for 2013). Nonresident aliens are also subject to a top estate tax rate of 40% but their estate tax exemption amount is only $60,000 which is not indexed for inflation.

The US imposes an estate tax liability on all US citizens and residents. See Section 2.2 for a discussion of who is a US resident and a nonresident alien for estate tax purposes. The estate tax will ultimately be assessed upon the gross estate, less applicable deductions. For a US citizen or resident, the gross estate is the fair market value of a decedent’s worldwide assets at date of death (the taxpayer may also elect an alternative valuation date 6 months after date of death). See Section 5.1 for filing procedures.

For an individual who is neither a US citizen nor a US resident (i.e., a nonresident alien), the gross estate only includes US situsproperty owned at death. US situs property includes real and tangible personal property located in the US, stock or options issued by a US corporation, debt of a US person (except portfolio debt), deferred compensation and pensions paid by US persons, and annuity contracts enforceable against US obligors. It does not include US bank deposits, insurance on the life of a nonresident alien or pensions payable by non-US persons.

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) determines the situs of different types of property, the treatment of which may be modified through the application of estate and gift tax treaties that the US has concluded with various countries (see Section 1.1).

Retained interests

Due to retained interest rules, the reach of the estate tax is broader than simply the assets a decedent owned at death. Notwithstanding attempts to make lifetime transfers, some transferred property may be deemed to remain within the decedent’s gross estate at his or her death. This applies to property subject to the following retained interests:

  • Certain gifts made within 3 years of death
  • Transfers with a retained life estate
  • Transfers taking effect at death
  • Certain annuities
  • Interests owned jointly
  • Transfers that provide for broad powers of appointment
  • Revocable transfers

In each case, the IRC applies rules to govern the circumstances in which assets that the decedent attempted to transfer are nevertheless included in the gross estate of the donor. The definition of the gross estate of a nonresident alien is “that part of his gross estate … which at the time of his death is situated in the United States.” Therefore, the estate will be subject to the same definitions of retained interests or powers as those that apply to the estate of a US citizen or resident alien — limited by the situs rules.

Situs rules provide that property subject to the retained interest transfer rules will be deemed situated in the US if such property was so situated either at the time of transfer or the time of death. This presents a number of issues for estate planning with respect to nonresident aliens. A transferor should therefore remain aware that transferring US property into a foreign entity may not convert the property to foreign situs property, even if the foreign entity no longer holds US property at the date of death.

Basis

All property subject to the estate tax receives a step-up in basis to its fair market value on the day of the decedent’s death. Each transferee’s basis in property received by a decedent is its fair market value for federal income tax purposes regardless of the transferor’s historical cost or basis adjustments.

State estate tax(許多州政府也有各自的房地產遺產稅)

Many states have a state-level estate tax. Where such taxes apply, the state-level estate tax is normally significant. Also, state tax rules for determining residence do not necessarily parallel the federal rules. Therefore, any nonresident alien should also seek state tax advice to determine potential estate tax and informational filing requirements for property situated in a given state. A decedent’s estate may be permitted an estate tax deduction at the federal level for any state estate taxes paid.

1.2 Gift tax(美國徵收贈與稅)

US citizens and resident aliens are subject to gift tax on transfers of all property, tangible and intangible, regardless of the location of the property. See Section 2.2 for a discussion of who is a US resident and a US nonresident alien for gift tax purposes. Gift tax applies to the fair market value of the transferred assets as of the date of the gift.

An annual, per donee exclusion (annual exclusion) exists that is indexed for inflation ($14,000 in 2013), which offsets tax on gifts of present interests. Transfers on behalf of a donee directly to a service provider for qualifying medical expenditures or to an educational institution for educational expenditures are exempt from the gift tax.

US citizens and resident aliens are subject to a top gift tax rate of 40% and are entitled to a $5 million gift tax exemption which is adjusted annually for inflation ($5.25 million for 2013). The US gift and estate tax are unified — there is only one exemption for both gift and estate tax purposes. Therefore, gifts made during an individual’s lifetime will reduce his or her estate tax exemption.

Gifts by US citizens or resident aliens to a US citizen spouse are entitled to an unlimited marital deduction and, therefore, do not incur gift tax. However, for transfers to a non-US citizen spouse, the marital deduction is limited to transfers of up to $143,000 in 2013 (as indexed for inflation). This is an annual limitation. See Section 5.2 for filing procedures.

Unlike US citizens and residents, nonresident alien individuals do not receive a lifetime gift tax exemption, but are entitled to use of the annual exclusion amount. Thus, every transfer of US situs property by a nonresident alien in excess of the gift tax annual exclusion ($14,000 in 2013) is subject to gift tax. Nonresident aliens must generally pay gift tax on transfers of real property and tangible property located in the US. Intangible property, including stocks and bonds, is generally exempt. Nonresident aliens, citizens and residents share the same gift tax rates. See Section 2.2 for a discussion of who is a US resident and a US nonresident alien for gift tax purposes.

1.3 Real estate transfer tax(美國徵收房地產移轉稅)

Individual states, counties and municipalities may impose a transfer or recordation tax on conveyances of real property. Generally, the transferor (individual or entity) remains liable for any tax due upon transfer; however, local customs vary as to how such costs are allocated among the transferor and transferee. Furthermore, indirect transfers of real estate through the sale or exchange of stock or partnership interests may also result in transfer taxes if the entity itself owns real estate. Although no federal transfer or recordation tax exists upon a transfer of real estate, if the underlying transfer constitutes a sale, the transaction may trigger both state and federal income taxes. Exceptions to the general rule may apply in situations where no change in the beneficial ownership of the property occurs, e.g., when the transfer occurs for purposes of securing financing or if the owner transfers property to a revocable trust controlled by the original property owner.

1.4 Endowment tax

No endowment tax laws exist in the US.

1.5 Transfer tax

A minority of states independently retain inheritance tax regimes. Generally, inheritance tax provisions do not impose taxes on transfers to spouses and descendants. Although, in the limited circumstances where inheritance taxes do apply, the impact can result in significant tax burdens, with rates ranging up to 20%.

1.6 Net wealth tax

US federal law does not impose a net wealth tax, but individual localities may impose such a tax on certain real and personal property interests. If at all, property subject to tax at the state and local level includes real estate, vehicles, boats, aircraft, livestock and intangible personal property. The tax generally only subjects real property or personal property physically situated within the specific taxing locality to this tax. Intangible property, if taxed at all, is generally taxable only to individual taxpayers residing within the locality, whereas personal property used in a trade or business carried on in the state or locality can subject individuals to tax based on their contacts with a taxing jurisdiction instead of on the basis of their residence.

1.7 Expatriation (exit) tax

Before 17 June 2008, the US did not have an exit tax. However, reporting requirements and potential US income tax liability still burdened former US citizens and former long-term residents under a complex set of rules generally in effect for each expatriate for 10 years following expatriation.

Effective from 17 June 2008, the new US exit tax regime subjects certain individuals known as covered expatriates to immediate taxation on the net unrealized gain in their property exceeding $600,000 (indexed for inflation; $668,000 for 2013). The tax treats covered expatriates as if they sold their worldwide property for fair market value the day before expatriating or terminating their US residency. In general, covered expatriates include US citizens and long-term residents (green card holders for any part of 8 tax years during the preceding 15 years) who have a 5-year average income tax liability exceeding $124,000 (indexed for inflation; $155,000 for 2013) or a net worth of $2 million or more. This treatment applies to most types of property interests held by individuals.

The above rules also affect the taxation of certain deferred compensation items (including foreign and US pension plans), interests in and distributions from non-grantor trusts and certain tax-deferred accounts (e.g., 529 plans, Coverdell education savings accounts and health-savings accounts) by accelerating the taxation of these amounts absent certain exceptions.

At the election of the taxpayer and subject to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) approval, the expatriating taxpayer may defer payment of the exit tax upon presentation of adequate security. This tax deferral election remains irrevocable, carries an interest charge and requires the taxpayer to waive any treaty rights with respect to the taxation of the property.

US citizens or resident aliens receiving gifts or bequests of more than $14,000 (indexed for inflation in 2013) from covered expatriates are taxed at the highest gift or estate tax rate currently in effect (40% in 2013). Under the general US gift tax rules, the IRS assesses the tax on the donor. However, in situations where a covered expatriate makes a gift or bequest to a US citizen or resident, the IRS imposes the gift tax liability on the donee. This rule does not appear to have a time limit either. So, the tax on gifts or bequests from a covered expatriate to a US citizen or resident may be assessed at any time when the receipt of such a gift or bequest occurs after the expatriation of the covered expatriate.

1.8 Generation-skipping transfer tax

In 1986, the US Congress enacted a generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax designed to prevent wealthy individuals from transferring property to heirs more than one generation removed from such individuals and thereby allowing that property to pass without any estate or gift tax liability assessed to the generation(s) in between the transferee and transferor. The GST tax is imposed on all direct transfers to skip persons and on taxable distributions and taxable terminations by trusts that have skip persons as beneficiaries. The IRC defines a skip person as someone who is 2 or more generations below the transferor or a trust for which all beneficiaries are skip persons. Generation-skipping transfers that are subject to GST tax are taxed at a rate of 40%. There is a GST exemption of $5 million which is adjusted annually for inflation ($5.25 million for 2013). The GST exemption is in addition to the gift and estate tax exemption.

General

The GST tax potentially applies to all transfers of a US person’s worldwide assets. See Section 2.2 for an analysis of who is deemed a US person. As stated above, the GST tax applies to any transfer from one taxpayer to a skip person or any donee assigned to a generation 2 or more generations below the transferor. For taxable terminations, the trust is liable for the GST tax on the fair market value of the assets in the trust at the time of the taxable termination. For taxable distributions, the beneficiary is liable for the GST tax on the fair market value of the property received. Similar to the estate tax, this is a tax-inclusive result. For direct skips, the the transferor is liable for the GST tax on the fair market value of the property transferred at the time of the transfer — a tax-exclusive result like the gift tax.

For GST tax purposes, a nonresident alien can transfer non-US situs property without the transfer triggering GST tax, but transfers of US situs property do trigger the GST tax regime — whether covered by applicable exclusions or exemptions or taxable in nature. The definition of US situs property depends upon whether the transfer constitutes a gift or bequest. Lifetime gift transfers use the same situs rules as the gift tax, and bequests use the same situs rules as the estate tax. In addition to the application of general situs rules, estate and gift tax treaties the US has concluded with various countries may also modify the situs and treatment of an asset. See Section 1.1. Additionally, the GST tax also excludes property exempt from taxation by the gift tax annual exclusion or the qualified educational and medical expenses exclusion.

GST tax exemption

US citizens, US residents and nonresident aliens have the same GST tax exemption amount. A taxpayer may irrevocably allocate GST tax exemption to any property transferred during life or at death. The individual or the individual’s executor can make the election on a timely filed gift or estate tax return. GST tax exemption is automatically allocated to direct skip transfers and indirect skip transfers (a transfer to a trust in which skip persons are beneficiaries) up to the total amount of the transferor’s remaining GST tax exemption, without further action by the transferor to affirmatively alter this allocation.

asiarealestate 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

1.1 Inheritance tax and tax on gifts during lifetime(英國徵收遺產稅)

The United Kingdom (UK) has a unified estate and gift tax called inheritance tax (IHT). IHT applies to the value of an individual’s estate when he or she dies (in which case he or she is deemed to make a transfer of the whole estate immediately before such time) and to certain transfers or gifts made during the individual’s lifetime. The tax applies on the basis of the loss to the donor’s estate that arises by reason of the transfer of value.

Adjustments are made to property that increases or decreases in value by reason of an individual’s death (i.e., life insurance policies that mature on death and form part of the deceased’s estate).

Certain other events give rise to deemed transfers of value (e.g., deliberate depreciatory transactions), and sales at an undervalue or where a person’s interest in certain trusts comes to an end or where a close company (broadly one in the control of 5 or fewer persons) makes a disposition. In addition, certain trusts are subject to 10 yearly inheritance tax charges and charges when an asset is distributed out of trust.

Types of transfer

Essentially 3 types of transfer for IHT purposes. These are:

Exempt transfers

As noted in 4 below, certain transfers, in lifetime or on death, attract special exemptions such as gifts to charities and spouses. These attract no tax.

Potentially exempt transfers (PETs)

These are certain lifetime transfers that only become chargeable if the transferor dies within 7 years of making the gift. Types of gift that fall within this category include outright gifts from one individual to another.

It should be noted that the potential tax exposure, which would arise on death, can normally be insured at quite competitive rates.

Chargeable transfers

These are immediately chargeable and will utilize the nil-rate band (see Section 4 below) and any available annual allowances, with any excess being liable at 20% (and potentially higher taxes if death occurs in the following 7 years). Common lifetime chargeable transfers include transfers to a trust or to a company that is not 100% owned by the transferor.

Transfers on death are fully chargeable at 40% unless specific reliefs are available (e.g., business property relief) or the transfer is exempt (e.g., a bequest to a spouse (to the extent that the spouse exemption is unlimited — see Section 4) or to an exempt person such as a UK-registered charity).

Transfers by non-UK deemed domiciliaries

With respect to the 3 types of transfers set out above, it is important to note that where an individual is non-UK deemed domiciled (as set out in section 2.2), then these transfer rules only apply to assets that are UK situs.

Gifts with reservation

A gift where the donor has reserved or retained some direct or indirect benefit or enjoyment over the property given away is treated as being part of the donor’s estate for tax purposes until the reservation is removed. It should be noted that this does not affect the normal tax consequences on making the gift; although if ultimately this causes potential double taxation, regulations provide appropriate offset to avoid this. For example, a gift to a trust of which the settlor is a beneficiary may trigger a lifetime tax charge at 20% whilst still remaining within the settlor’s estate for IHT purposes. The release of the reservation is regarded as the making of a potentially exempt transfer. These provisions can also be triggered by any informal non-binding arrangement made with the recipient of the gift, to provide a benefit in some indirect way to the donor.

Pre-owned assets charge

Although this is not a transfer tax, this income tax charge depends on whether or not property is included in a person’s estate for IHT purposes. The provisions were introduced to counter planning measures that gave the donor continued benefit from the assets given away, but which did not fall within the gifts with reservation legislation. From 6 April 2005, where a donor has previously owned an asset (either tangible or intangible) and no longer does so, but arrangements have been made to give him or her continued enjoyment of such property, without the asset forming part of his or her estate for IHT purposes, an income tax charge is imposed on him or her, broadly based on the value of the benefit he or she receives. The charge applies where there was previous ownership by the donor at any time since 17 March 1986, and complex rules cover situations where substitutions and replacements have been made by the donee since then. Gifts of cash can also cause the provisions to apply if made within the prior 7 years.

1.2. Gift tax

There is no specific gift tax in UK law although the above sets out circumstances when lifetime gifts can trigger an IHT charge. Additionally, lifetime gifts (other than to a spouse) are treated as disposals for capital gains tax purposes.

1.3. Real estate transfer tax(英國有房地產移轉稅)

The UK levies a stamp duty land tax charge on transfers of land and buildings, at rates ranging from 0% to 7% (for residential properties in excess of £2 million). The duty is charged on the purchaser of the land or property. Gifts of land and buildings for no chargeable consideration do not, however, realize a charge.

As well as this, a special stamp duty land tax (SDLT) rate of 15% is now payable on the acquisition of residential properties above £2m by ‘non-natural persons’, such as companies (which are defined as bodies corporate), collective investment schemes and partnerships where at least 1 of the partners is a company (irrespective of whether these are UK or non-UK entities). These changes may affect many individuals with offshore structures who use Special Purpose Vehicles or offshore trusts to hold UK property and will not be limited to those who have engaged in SDLT planning.

An annual tax charge (known as the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings “ATED”) equivalent to between 0.3% and 0.75% of the property value (but capped initially at a maximum of £140,000 p.a.) will apply to those interests held by non-natural persons from 1 April 2013.

1.4. Endowment tax

There is no endowment tax in the UK.

1.5. Transfer duty

There is no specific transfer duty in UK law (other than for real estate), although the above sets out circumstances when lifetime gifts can trigger an IHT charge.

1.6. Net wealth tax

There is no net wealth tax in the UK. However, an annual ATED charge (mentioned above in Section 1.3) is to apply from April 2013 for residential properties in excess of £2 million held by ‘non-natural persons’.

asiarealestate 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()